3 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (ECFR) and Art. Some international norms directly refer to the body, such as Art. The body has been, and still is, a site of contestation, of political struggles, and civil rights litigation. Various norms pre- and proscribe conduct with bodies, ranging from inflicting physical harm to consent and rules about various medical procedures. It is therefore not surprising that the body is a central object of human rights protection as well as legal regulation. Against the temper of times, it should resort to a naturalistic conception because it accommodates interests of stakeholders in the best way.įor human creatures, having a body and being embodied are necessary conditions of existence. The law must thus draw normative boundaries. It argues that bodies indeed have multiple boundaries, but none of them qualifies for legal purposes. This paper analyzes these boundaries with a focus on the right to bodily integrity, in light of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the foundational legal distinction between persons and things. Of particular importance is the question of the boundaries of the body because the legal treatment of prostheses and assistive devices depends on whether they are part of it. Civil rights activists call for better protection of cyborg bodies some legal scholars suggest redefining or even dismissing the right to bodily integrity because of its uncertain foundations. Drawing on polyphonic arguments, they suggest social or post-human reconceptualizations with potential legal implications. Answers might appear evident, but commonsensical conceptions of the body have been cast into doubt by feminists, artists, and disability theorists. But the law only rarely asks what the body is more precisely. That technology had to come from somewhere, so either the Kazakhs inhabited a world adjacent to Sudra or downstream from it so there were similarities in art and culture and architecture, or the Rebirth Chambers and other advanced technology were themselves brought to Sudra from upstream worlds and simply shut down rather than completely destroyed after the Sudrans nearly wiped themselves out.The body is precondition of human existence and reference point of many legal norms. Some of this technology included Rebirth Chambers - Indra even accesses the Filter through one - which was later destroyed to prevent too much cultural contamination. The only problem with this theory is that long before anyone from earth showed up in Kiengir, the Lamassu had upstream technology brought in to allow the locals to defend themselves, as part of its broader directive to safeguard the Worldstream from disruption. Given how time is explicitly stated to pass at different rates in different parts of the Breach compared to the worlds in the Worldstream, it isn’t out of the question that the Kazakhs were the ancestors of the Sudrans. Here’s the thing: What we see of the world that Drushka is standing watch in, called The Emergence, looks so similar to what we’ve seen of Sudra as to be almost identical. It’s semi-implied but never explicitly stated that there’s a trans-universal system in place to keep the Worldstream stable, and the Lamassu computer network that controls Kiengir is part of that network, and the fact that realities are starting to glitch and break down further implies that this system is damaged or overwhelmed. At least, that’s what normally happens, but for some reason the transmigration of souls was limited or stopped or throttled. Put it all together and the game all but states that there is an afterlife, but it operates on the same rules as life - it’s an adjacent or related universe to our own and minds / spirits / souls / cognitive algorithms can migrate between those universes under certain conditions even if the material body they used to pilot is no longer functional. Except there’s Trace’s original paper and the axioms he starts with, where reality is described as algorithms running a universal / multiversal simulation, and cognition is a sub-algorithm within the parent algorithm.
0 kommentar(er)
